I was reading in the "W3C and Validation" thread Todd's comment about the XHTML moving up from 1.0 to 2.2. I was able to find the W3C's Working Draft of XHTML 2.0. I wanted to know if the browsers are starting to support it or if we still have to wait. Would also I like to know for HTML 5.0, as well as CSS 3. Thanks.
-
Re: XHTML 2.0?
Wed, May 14, 2008 - 9:31 AMIm actually rather curious about this too. I have a copy of Dreamweaver 8 which I use on occasion. It does have a validation function on it but I still go to W3C to check things out. Is there a way to get programs like Dreamweaver to upgrade validation or is that one of those things that requires you to upgrade that program entirely to the latest and greatest?
-
Re: XHTML 2.0?
Wed, May 14, 2008 - 2:02 PMgilbert, i think the short answer is "no." I don't believe any of the major browsers support CSS3 yet, much less the new versions of X/HTML. it could be a couple years yet before these are implemented. idea: you can test for support by creating a page that implements upgraded versions of these languages, then open that page in FF & IE to see if they work. also, you can check the w3c site to see if they consider the new versions "finalized." But the answer to that is contained in your OP: a "working draft" is not a finalized standard, so I'm doubting the browsers will implement it until, you know, a couple years after the W3C final final finalizes it. we're all eager for the implementation of CSS3 around here: simple round-cornered rectangles, without ANY images!!! ahh, the coder's dream. -
-
Re: XHTML 2.0?
Wed, May 14, 2008 - 10:57 PMGeez after all the "hub-bub" I'd heard about XHTML 2.2 and now I find out they don't even have a finalized XHTML 2.0 yet! So much for trying to keep up (or "keep down") with the W3C's standards..lol
Jesse, I think you've given some good advice here. I'm still waiting with baited breath though to hear more about HTML 5. So far all I've heard is that it doesn't support frames..haha.
-
-
Re: XHTML 2.0?
Sat, May 17, 2008 - 10:25 AMSo which markup language is best to use for creating websites? HTML 4.0, HMTL 4.01, XHTML1.0, or XHTML 1.1? I tend to use XHTML 1.0, but sometimes go back to HTML 4.0. -
-
Re: XHTML 2.0?
Tue, May 20, 2008 - 7:21 PMi still use 4.01 transitional sometimes when I'm really lazy and in a hurry, just because it's the default doctype on my version of GoLive
but i'm making an effort to only write my new "real" sites in XHTML and I am probably behind the curve on this effort. lots of other folks have been using XHTML 1.0 strict for as long as it's been out.
of course ultimately it's up to you and as long as your pages display properly, very few people really care...
just remember to separate style from content!!!
-